Goods and Service Tax: The International Experience
Submitted by root on Tue, 08/29/2017 - 14:15
1. The international Experience shows that the success of GST depends mostly on model & effective implementation. For Example: Experience in countries like Australia, Canada and New Zealand shows that this results in better fiscal finance and price stability.
2. International experience also shows that inflation went up in short term as lot of new services and goods taxed under GST which were not taxed earlier. Therefore, on one hand there is possibility of mitigation of cascading effects and increased revenue base for government; on the other hand, there is possibility of spike in prices also.
3. The macro economic indicators like GDP growth rate, fiscal balance, current account balance, Tax – GDP ratio have improved in most of countries. For example: Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Singapore and U.S. etc. Therefore, making these economics more competitive generating revenues through better exports & leading to price stability.
4. Similar to Indian context, it is only Canada that has concept of dual GST.
In Canada, the GST replaced the manufacturer's Sales Tax and came into force in 1991 leading to better macro economic performance in terms of growth, government finance, tax revenues etc. in post GST period.
International Experience Lessons
1. The main challenge encountered by most GST countries was that of GST's inflationary nature especially when the effective tax rate is higher than what prevailed earlier. For instance, Singapore saw spike in inflation in 1994, when it introduced GST. Therefore, it is important for administrators to keep tabs on how prices move after GST's implementation.
2. Another key lesson, is that businesses need to start early with the implementation process to be GST ready. As for example: Malaysian Government received strong resentment even after providing one & half year for GST preparedness. Given the complex GST model in India, and the need for businesses to undergo a transformation to adapt to the GST regime, it will be quite challenging for Indian government to tackle.
3. The international experience's lesson also suggest that it is necessary to keep exemptions in GST minimum as keeping exemptions list long will not enhance states fiscal autonomy, making tax base narrower etc. Example: New Zealand has the least number of exemptions and the most comprehensive coverage of GST.
4. Also the government needs to go for a successful 'Digital India' programme as GST will require a state of art IT infrastructure and ensuring this high speed. IT connectivity across states with huge geographical disparity will be a challenge in such a short time.
Conclusion: From the international experiences & lessons learnt there is no denying that acceptance of GST by general public, businesses and firms would not be an easy task but with (1) advance planning and extending adequate time to industry, (2) continued dialogues between business & administrators, (3) engaging with industry on implementation of planning, (4) Timely release of legislative documents, have proven to aid in smooth GST implementation in many countries.
Some Facts Related to GST – Implementation globally
- Around 160 countries in world have implemented VAT/GST.
- ASEAN – 7 countries
- ASIA – 19 countries
- EUROPE – 53 Countries
- AFBICA – 44 countries
- France – was one of the first country to implement GST in 1954, followed by Germany – 1968
- United Kingdom - 1973
- Typically GST a unified tax system but countries like Canada & Brazil have dual GST like India.